User Satisfaction Analysis of QGIS and CarryMap Using End User Computing Statisfaction and User Centered Design Methods

Ira Zulfa; Richasanty Septima; Muhamad Yustisar; Rapiah Rapiah

doi:10.62951/ijcts.v2i2.240

Authors

Ira Zulfa Universitas Gajah Putih
Richasanty Septima Universitas Gajah Putih
Muhamad Yustisar Universitas Gajah Putih
Rapiah Rapiah Universitas Gajah Putih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijcts.v2i2.240

Keywords:

CarryMap, EUCS, QGIS, UCD, User satisfaction

Abstract

Using End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) and User Centered Design (UCD) methods, this study investigated user satisfaction with QGIS and CarryMap. The research objective was to deploy elements such as content, accuracy, ease of use, and timeliness. A survey of students and teachers showed that users were more satisfied with the latest versions of both applications. The findings show that the user interface and functionality have evolved, which indicates the direction of future development of mapping applications.

References

S. Park, A. Nielsen, R. Bailey, D. Trolle, and K. Bieger, “A QGIS-based graphical user interface for application and evaluation of SWAT-MODFLOW models,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 111, pp. 493–497, 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2018.10.017.

S. Dhakal, P. Martin, and P. Smith, “NOMA With Guaranteed Weak User QoS: Design and Analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 32884–32896, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900067.

L. P. Facun et al., “QGIS Shoreline Change Analysis Tool (QSCAT): A fast, open-source shoreline change analysis plugin for QGIS,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 184, p. 106263, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106263.

M. Chimienti, I. Danzi, V. Gattulli, D. Impedovo, G. Pirlo, and D. Veneto, “Behavioral Analysis for User Satisfaction,” Proc. 2022 IEEE 8th Int. Conf. Multimed. Big Data, pp. 113–119, 2022, doi: 10.1109/BigMM55396.2022.00027.

J. Victory, A. Rifai, and S. Handayani, “The Satisfaction Analysis of Local Public Transportation (Carry) Services at Batam, Indonesia,” Indones. J. Multidiscip. Sci., 2022, doi: 10.55324/ijoms.v1i1.324.

G. Titti, A. Sarretta, L. Lombardo, S. Crema, A. Pasuto, and L. Borgatti, “Mapping Susceptibility With Open-Source Tools: A New Plugin for QGIS,” Front. Earth Sci., vol. 10, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.842425.

B. Jakimow et al., “EnMAP-Box: Imaging spectroscopy in QGIS,” SoftwareX, vol. 23, p. 101507, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2023.101507.

I. Barberena, M. Campo-Bescós, and J. Casalí, “Introducing QAnnAGNPS - A QGIS plugin to facilitate the use of AnnAGNPS (Annualized Agricultural Nonpoint source model),” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 174, p. 105968, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.105968.

S. Li, B. Zhu, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, and Z. Yu, “A Two-Stage Nonlinear User Satisfaction Decision Model Based on Online Review Mining: Considering Non-Compensatory and Compensatory Stages,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 19, pp. 272–296, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jtaer19010015.

A. J. Desmal, S. Hamid, M. Othman, and A. Zolait, “A user satisfaction model for mobile government services: a literature review,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 8, 2022, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1074.

G. W. Pereira et al., “Smart-Map: An Open-Source QGIS Plugin for Digital Mapping Using Machine Learning Techniques and Ordinary Kriging,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.3390/agronomy12061350.

L. Duarte, C. Queirós, and A. Teodoro, “Comparative analysis of QGIS plugins for Web Maps creation,” La Granja, no. 34, 2021, doi: 10.17163/lgr.n34.2021.01.

X. H. Eldita, S. Safitri, and R. Setyadi, “Analysis of User Satisfaction with the Cards Application Using the End User Computing Satisfaction Method,” J. Informatics Inf. Syst. Softw. Eng. Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.20895/inista.v6i2.1302.

S. Hazra, K. Bora, and P. A. Singh, “Mapping World: A Comparative Analysis of Functionality and Usability between QGIS and ArcGIS,” Recent Adv. Comput. Sci. Commun., 2024, doi: 10.2174/0126662558332529240919063643.

K. Shaaban, K. Shakeel, T. Rashidi, and I. Kim, “Measuring users’ satisfaction of the road network using structural equation modeling,” Int. J. Sustain. Transp., vol. 16, pp. 792–803, 2021, doi: 10.1080/15568318.2021.1934916.

N. Le and K. Le, “Performance Analysis of NOMA Short-Packet Communications With QoS-Based SIC Detecting Order,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 617–621, 2022, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2021.3138958.

X. Sheng et al., “Performance Analysis of STAR-RIS Assisted Secure Cognitive NOMA-HARQ Networks,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 13, pp. 696–700, 2024, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2023.3340135.